The Filiformis (Fil) locus is found to be allelic to reductus (Red1)

 

Ambrose, M.J.                                                                                                 John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK

 

Introduction

The gene reductus (red1) was first reported by Winge in 1936 (1) as reducing the size of leaflets by 65- 90% while also reducing the size of stipules but to a lesser degree. Lamprecht later published on the gene maximo-reductus (mare) with similar phenotype (2, 3). In 1976 Marx confirmed allelism between mare and red1 which resulted in red being accepted as the valid gene symbol and the symbol mare was discontinued (3). Two further induced mutants at the red1 locus have subsequently been isolated by Rozov (4).

 

Recent observations on an induced mutation (WL 5143 flagellarius) reported by Stig Blixt showed a similar but more severe and earlier reduction in the size of leaflets and stipules than witnessed in the alleles of red1-1, red1-2, red1-3, with these becoming tread like after the first 3 nodes (Fig. 1a). This phenotype was noted as bearing a striking similarity to an induced mutant reported by Monti (5) as (filiformis, fil) in Parvus (Fig. 1b) which was described as exhibiting strong modification of leaflets and flowers with leaflets and stipules becoming progressively reduced until threadlike.

 

Figure 1. Phenotypes of mutants of a. WL 5143 flagallarius b. Mutant P 674 (filiformis).  Photograph by Stig Blixt.

 

A further induced filiformis mutant (WL 5946) isolated again by Stig Blixt was noted in the Nordic collection but had not been the subject of any reported allelism study.  Allelism tests were therefore conducted between these mutants and red1 mutants to explore their relationships and interactions.

 

 

Results

Two of the mutants (WL 5143 and WL 5946) were crossed directly as the pollen was fertile. This is not the case for JI 2181 which is maintained as a heterozygous line. Crosses were performed to 9 JI 2181 plants, of which 3 were revealed to be heterozygous by progeny tests. The results of the allelism tests are presented in Table 1 which revealed all the three mutants to be allelic to red1.

 

Table 1. Allelism tests between mutants and JI 802 (red1-1).

Cross

F1 plants

Phenotype of F1 plants

JI 802 x WL 5143

4

All of mutant phenotype

JI 802 X WL 5946

3

All of mutant phenotype

JI 802 X JI 2181 (potential hets)

14

8/14 of mutant phenotype

 

In the course of these studies all mutants, with the exception of JI 2181 produced viable pollen, confirming the findings of Monti (5). The anthers of JI 2181 homozygous mutants develop, but they fail to produce pollen. A summary of the lines and their pollen and fertility status is presented in Table 2.

 

Table 2. Table of reductus mutants confirmed through allelism tests.

Line number

JI no.

Mutagen

Year

Initial line

Pollen

viable

Fertile

Former gene symbol

Valid gene symbol

Winge 37 (WL 449)

802

Spont.

1936

 

yes

yes

red

red1-1

XCIM4M (WL 1674)

833

Spont.

1967

 

yes

yes

mare

red1-2 (new)

SG 0634

3058

EMS

1997

SG

yes

yes

red1-2

red1-3 (new)

SG 0404

3254

EMS

1997

SG

yes

yes

red1-3

red1-4 (new)

WL 5143 (flagellarius)

3514

 

 

W709

yes

yes

 

red1-5 (new)

P 674g

2181

DES

1970

Parvus

no

no

fil

red1-6 (new)

WL 5946 (filiformis)

3552

EMS

 

Parvus

yes

no

 

red1-7(new)

 

Discussion

The severe reduction in leaf and stipule area in mutants of filiformis and flagellarius have been shown to be allelic to red1 mutants. The Red1 locus, having been established earlier, has precedence over Fil which is no longer considered a valid symbol but a synonym for Red1. Three new alleles have thus been added to the red1 series bringing the total number of known alleles at this locus to 7. This study provides a useful point at which to revise the extended series of alleles. This is required to overcome the problem of the alleles identified by Rozov (4) as being numbered with reference to only one of the earlier alleles rather than the two resulting from the investigations by Marx (3). The proposed renumbering of the alleles presented in Table 2 follows the sequence in which they were established as red1 alleles in the literature.

 

With the exception of red1-3 and red1-4, the remaining four mutant alleles are present in widely different parental backgrounds preventing any close comparison of the phenotypic severity of these alleles. A backcross programme is currently underway using JI 2822 as the recurrent parent in order to generate near-isogenic lines for each of the mutant alleles so that the differences in severity of each allele can be more easily studied.

 

 

1.  Winge, O. 1936. Comptes rendus des travaux du Laboratoire Carlesberg, 21: 271-393.

2.  Lamprecht H. 1967. Phyton 12: 252-265.

3.  Marx, G.A. 1976. Pisum Newsletter 8:39.

4.  Rozov, S.M., Gorel, F.L. and Berdnikov V.A. 1997. Pisum Genetics 29: 44-46.

5.  Monti, L.M. 1970. Pisum Newsletter 2: 21.